UNITED NATIONS USELESS ORGANISATION - POLITICAL INTELLECTUALISM OF JAVIER MILEI THAT FEW UNDERSTANDS
The focus over social media is on the spectacle of 77 countries walking out on Netanyahu's speech. And a spectacle it certainly was, with cameras panned to show an empty hall when in reality the majority of representatives remained. Netanyahu, Trump, Turkey's Edrogan, Palestine's Abbas and Iran's Pezeshkian said what we expected them to say. Raw grit and passionate delivery, but nothing new.
One leader spoke at UNGA81 and the world hardly pays attention. A man who, in less than 2 years, has brought his country back from decades of economic collapse, from chronic crazy inflation that peaked at 20,262% in March 1990, to under 30% today, a country that was once the top 10 richest country in the world but completely wrecked by decades of socialist Peronism, to two consecutive years of primary fiscal surplus for the first time in nearly two decades, and a 4.4% real GDP growth in 2025. Although not completely out of the woods, the IMF describes the stabilisation as a major achievement, no less a miracle. When such a man speaks, it is worth paying attention. I am referring to Javier Milei, President of Argentina.
In 1985, Lee Kuan Yew addressed a Joint Session of the US Congress (a rare privilege) which attracted enormous curiosity because Singapore had emerged as an "Asian Tiger". Milei ought to command the same curiosity at the UN today, given Argentina's extraordinary turnaround. Whether his anarcho-capitalist experiment can see the same success as Singapore's disciplined state capitalism is besides the point. Lee challenged the prevailing wisdom on protectionism; Milei challenges something deeper -- the prevailing definition of "common sense." And perhaps that is precisely why his speech deserves to be heard less as political provocation and more as an intellectual challenge to the assumptions of our age.
But they are all framed his speech under the headline "Milei calls the UN useless." The world totally mis-characterised his speech and none in Singapore has picked up on the wisdom he was imparting. We have lost the wisdom to discern "political philosophy" from "political contestation".
Milei's speech deserves to be read as an intellectual challenge to the premise of contemporary international order, rather than merely another political speech. The disproportion between the substance of that challenge and the way it was received, tells us something about contemporary discourse - an inability to discern wisdom.
Milei delivered a fiery speech at UNGA81 which can be synthesized into five fundamental propositions:
1. The UN has broken its sacred covenant.
2. Globalism is a collectivist Leviathan
3. The global bureaucracy is a parasitic caste
4. True peace requires individual liberty and sovereignty
5. Progress requires hyper-innovation free from preventative regulation.
Gramscian View On PowerTo understand what Milei was talking about, you need to understand this Italian communist Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937). He was a brilliant Marxist philosopher and co-founder of the Italian Communist Party, imprisoned by Mussolini’s fascist regime. Unable to fight on the streets, he used his time in prison to write "The Prison Notebooks", fundamentally changing how we understand power.
Once you grasp the Gramscian view, you will begin to understand what all these nonsense are all about: leftist wokeism, "lived experience", "Free Palestine", illegal aliens are not law breakers, woke Hollywood, transgenderism, progressive universities, women in men's sports, Israel commits genocide, etc.
Mao : "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."
Gramsci concept: Power rules through the manufacturing of consent, but keeps the gun in reserve..
Cultural Hegemony:
Gramsci argued that a ruling class maintains power not just through military force or laws (coercion), but by controlling culture, education, religion, and media (consent). By dominating these institutions, the elite shapes how everyone thinks.
"Common Sense" as a Trap:
Gramsci believed that what society calls "common sense" isn't natural at all. It is a set of values engineered by the ruling class to make their dominance seem normal, inevitable, and "just the way things are. (Elites engineer → useful idiots propagate → uninformed normalise it)
"The Counter-Hegemonic Revolution:
To overthrow the elite, you cannot just launch a sudden political coup. You must first fight a "war of position" -- a long, relentless cultural battle to dismantle the elite's "common sense" and build an entirely new worldview.
Milei's Counter-Hegemonic Revolution
The Argentine President looks at global institutions like the UN and argues that the Left has achieved Gramscian hegemony, making "socialist collectivism" the default global common sense. The UN and the Western World, has been overrun by the Left. From a Gramscian perspective, Javier Milei views the current Overton window as an artificially engineered leftist monopoly.
Milei agrees with Gramsci's diagnosis of power but completely flips the prescription. Therefore, Milei acts as a capitalist revolutionary, using Gramsci's exact playbook to launch a counter-hegemonic war to replace collectivist culture with unbridled free-market capitalism.
Parsing the fiery rhetoric of Milei’s UNGA address through the Marxist framework of Antonio Gramsci reveals a profound paradox. Milei, a self-described "anarcho-capitalist," uses an explicitly Gramscian blueprint to dismantle what he perceives as a global leftist status quo.Here is how Milei’s speech parses through the five pillars of Gramscian thought:
1. Hegemony (The Globalist "Sacred Covenant")
Gramsci defined hegemony as the cultural and ideological dominance of a ruling class, maintained not just through force, but through consensual institutions that shape worldview.
Milei's Proposition: The UN has transitioned from a peace-keeping body into a "multi-tentacled Leviathan" that dictates how citizens should live, using the 2030 Agenda and the Pact for the Future as a "socialist straitjacket."
Gramscian Parsing: Milei is explicitly diagnosing what Gramsci called cultural hegemony. Milei argues that the global ruling elite no longer rules by mere diplomacy, but by ideological consensus -- forcing a "woke agenda" and collectivist standards onto sovereign nations. From this perspective, the UN's "sacred covenant" is actually a mechanism of global hegemonic control.
2. Common Sense (The "Arrogant Bureaucrats")
For Gramsci, common sense (senso comune) is the uncritical, absorbed, and fragmented worldview of the masses, often engineered by the ruling class to make their hegemony seem natural and unquestionable.
Milei's Proposition: The global status quo is sustained by a "caste of fatally arrogant parasites masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats". He argues that "good people" do not seek to control the lives of others under the guise of "moral posturing."
Gramscian Parsing: Milei attempts to shatter the established "common sense"—the universal assumption that international bureaucracies act inherently for the "global good." By reframing climate accords, pandemic restrictions, and centralized regulations as "global experiments in social control disguised as science," Milei exposes globalist common sense as an artificial construct designed to keep the population compliant.
3. Organic Intellectuals (The Economist-President)
Gramsci argued that every rising social class creates its own organic intellectuals—individuals who do not merely spin abstract theories, but actively organize, articulate, and give legal and political voice to the interests of their class.
Milei's Proposition: He famously began his UN address by stating, "I am not a politician, I am a liberal-libertarian economist," propelled to power by the catastrophic failure of collectivism.
Gramscian Parsing: Milei is acting as the ultimate right-wing organic intellectual. He functions as the economic and philosophical vanguard for a global middle-and-working class frustrated by taxation and regulation. He uses his technical background in economics not as an academic exercise, but as a political weapon to provide the capitalist underclass with the vocabulary to fight the state.
4. Civil Society (The Battleground for Freedom)
In Gramsci’s architecture, civil society (churches, schools, media, cultural institutions) is the crucial buffer zone where hegemony is generated and maintained outside of the state’s direct coercive apparatus.
Milei's Proposition: True peace and progress cannot be engineered top-down by international bodies. They are built generation after generation through free enterprise, work, and individual sovereignty. He advocates for unchecked technological arenas like artificial intelligence, free from preemptive state restrictions.
Gramscian Parsing: Milei views civil society as a space that has been thoroughly colonized by the left's "woke collectivism." His defense of private property, family, and free enterprise is an effort to reclaim civil society. By demanding that domains like AI remain unregulated, he is trying to protect the private sphere of civil society from being absorbed into the hegemonic global state.
5. Counter-Hegemony (The "Agenda of Freedom")
Counter-hegemony is the process by which a subordinate class systematically builds an alternative framework of culture, politics, and values to challenge and eventually overthrow the existing hegemonic order.
Milei's Proposition: Argentina will no longer remain neutral in global conflicts. The nation is actively abandoning the UN’s socialist agendas to spearhead an "agenda of freedom" aligned with Western values, private property, and absolute liberty.
Gramscian Parsing: Milei's entire speech is a manifesto for a global counter-hegemonic revolution. He is not attempting to reform the UN from within; he is declaring an ideological war. By positioning Argentina as a beacon for unbridled capitalism and anti-globalism, he is attempting to construct a new historic bloc -- a coalition of sovereign peoples and libertarian thinkers determined to uproot the established global consensus.
The paradox, or ultimate irony, is Javier Milei uses the exact methodology of the Marxist left to fight the left. He recognizes that to defeat global collectivism, he cannot just win an election; he must launch a relentless, counter-hegemonic assault on the very institutions that dictate global culture and common sense
When you step back and strip away the political jargon, Javier Milei’s fiery crusade against the United Nations and the Western establishment isn't just a political disagreement -- it is a war for the control of your mind. Milei’s core realization is that the global elites have subtly re-engineered what we consider "normal" and "common sense," turning heavy government regulations, massive bureaucracies, and top-down lifestyle dictates into the default worldview. He is attacking these institutions because he believes they have quietly trapped the Western world in an invisible straitjacket of collectivism, where individual freedom is slowly being traded for bureaucratic control under the guise of the "global good." Milei is playing a much deeper game than most politicians; he isn't just trying to win an election or balance a budget, but is attempting to violently shatter this artificial status quo. By understanding this hidden intellectual battlefield, we can finally see his erratic, chainsaw-wielding persona for what it truly is: a deliberate attempt to wake up the ordinary citizen, dismantle the elite's monopoly on reality, and make absolute personal liberty the new common sense.
To go Home Page, click Arrow on the Top Left.
To be informed of new posts, go Home Page, click the Triple Bar at the Top Left. Fill in your email when Menu appears


Comments