ILLEGAL $$$ COLLECTED BY MND: WORKERS' PARTY "RULE-OF-LAW" VS PAP "RULE-BY-LAW" AND BAD TECHNOCRATIC MESSAGING
Bertha Henson 8 May 2026 "I wouldm't even mind a lecture on what should be in the law and what can be up to executive discretion or put as 'regulations' - if the G is inclined to give it. Or the AGC. Or the opposition. Or any lawyer." Following an internal review, the government found that certain agencies of the Ministry of National Development (HDB, URA, NParks, BCA) have collected certain fees for decades which have not been anchored in legislation. Parliament passed a legislation to retroactively validate these collections. The government took a "rule-by-law" (legality) argument that the fees were charged in good faith, services were genuinely provided, costs were genuinely incurred, and the issue was more one of legal formality or technical basis rather than wrongful enrichment. The opposition Workers' Party took the "rule-of-law" argument that if the fees lacked legislative authority, then on what basis were Singaporeans compe...